Feed aggregator

Centraal Justitieel Incassobureau (Reconnaissance et exécution des sanctions pécuniaires)
Espace de liberté, sécurité et justice
L’autorité compétente de l’État d’exécution ne peut pas refuser la reconnaissance et l’exécution d’une amende pour une infraction routière, infligée à la personne au nom de laquelle le véhicule est immatriculé, pour autant qu’une telle présomption de responsabilité peut être renversée

EVN Bulgaria Toplofikatsia
Énergie
Le droit de l’Union ne s’oppose pas à une réglementation nationale qui prévoit que chaque propriétaire d’un appartement dans un immeuble détenu en copropriété soit tenu de contribuer aux frais du chauffage alimentant les parties communes

In [2019] EWHC 2766 (Ch) Vestel Elektronik v HEVC Advance and Koninklijke Philips NV, Hacon J found no jurisdiction in a stand-alone competition law damages case (no finding of infringement yet; claim is one of abuse of dominant position). He rejected the existence of jurisdiction against Philips NV (of The Netherlands) on the basis that no damage existing or potential could be shown grounding Article 7(2) Brussels Ia tortious Jurisdiction. Against the Delaware defendant, the relevant CPR rules applied per Four Seasons v Brownlie did not lead to jurisdiction either.

Geert.

(Handbook of) EU Private International Law, 2nd ed. 2016, Chapter 2, Heading 2.2.12.1

 

Douane

Blanchiment

Santé publique

On 13-14 February 2020, ERA (Academy of European Law) will host a Seminar in Strasbourg to present the major judgments related to family matters issued by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in 2019. The focus of the presentations will be mainly on:

• Children in European migration law
• Parental rights, pre-adoption foster care and adoption
• Parental child abduction
• Reproductive rights and surrogacy
• LGBTQI rights and gender identity

The Seminar, organised by Dr Angelika Fuchs, will provide participants with a detailed understanding of this recent jurisprudence. The focus will be placed, in particular, on Article 8 ECHR (respect for private and family life) and the analysis of the case law of the ECtHR will tackle the legal implications but it will also extend to social, emotional and biological factors.

The opening speech will be given by Ksenija Turkovi?, Judge at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

More information on the event and on registration is available here.

This event is organised with the support of the Erasmus+ programme of the European Union

Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena
Agriculture
La protection de la dénomination « Aceto Balsamico di Modena » ne s’étend pas à l’utilisation des termes non géographiques de celle-ci tels que « aceto » et « balsamico »

Quel premier état des lieux des cours criminelles peut-on faire ? Depuis septembre, les procès s’enchaînent dans les six départements concernés pour le moment par l’expérimentation. Le septième, à la cour d’assises des Ardennes, ne commencera l’expérimentation qu’à partir de 2020. Nous avons demandé à des avocats ce qu’ils retenaient des affaires jugées.

en lire plus

Urbanisme

République tchèque / Parlement et Conseil
Politique industrielle
La Cour de justice rejette le recours de la République tchèque contre la directive renforçant le contrôle de l’acquisition et de la détention d’armes à feu

Hot on the heels of yesterday’s post on e-collars, a short note on yet another trade and animal welfare /biodiversity case. In [2019] EWHC 2951 (Admin) Friends of Antique Cultural Treasures v Secretary of State for the environment, food and rural affairs, Justice Jay (‘Jay J’ even though correct might sound a bit too intimate) upheld the UK’s planned ban on ivory trade, stricter than anything in place elsewhere. As a general rule, the Act interdicts the sale of antique worked ivory, that is to say pre-1947 artefacts, unless one of limited exemptions is applicable.

The discussion engages CITES, pre-emption /exhaustion by harmonised EU law, the environmental guarantee of Article 193 TFEU (albeit not, oddly, the issue of notification to the EC), Article 34 TFEU, and A1P1 ECHR.

On uncertainty, Justice Jay refers to the precautionary principle: at 155: ‘we are in the realm of scientific and evidentiary uncertainty, and the need for a high level of protection. §3.1 of the Commission’s 2017 Guidance makes that explicit. Although the evidence bearing on the issues of indirect causation and demand in Far Eastern markets may be uncertain, statistically questionable, impressionistic and often anecdotal, I consider that these factors do not preclude the taking of bold and robust action in the light of the precautionary principle.’

Rosalind English has analysis here and refers even to Edmund de Waal’s novel The Hare with the Amber Eyes which has been on my reading list after my wife recommended it – this is a good reminder.

Geert.

EU environmental law (with Leonie Reins), Edward Elgar, 2018, p.28 ff., and Chapter 17 (p.308 ff).