Agrégateur de flux

Non lieu à renvoi

I have of course posted regularly on the issues of unstunned slaughter, freedom of religious expression and animal welfare (search tag ‘shechita’ should pull out the relevant postings). The Belgian Constitutional court, to the expectations I assume of counsel in the case, yesterday referred to the CJEU for preliminary reference (cases 52 and 53/2019).

The subject of the litigation is the Flemish decree banning unstunned slaughter outright (for standing reasons the similar Walloon regime is no longer sub judice). The Belgian court requests the CJEU to clarify its judgment in C-426/16, on which I reported here,

Q1: does Regulation 1099/2009 allow Member States to introduce an outright ban; Q2 in the affirmative, is that compatible with the Charter’s right to religious expression; Q3 in the event of an affirmative answer to Q1: the elephant in the Regulation’s room which I flagged years back: is it not discriminatory to allow Member States to restrict religious slaughter, while simply exempting hunting, fishing and ‘sporting and cultural events’ from the Regulation altogether.

Readers will know my answer to these questions.

Geert.

 

 

Sans saisir la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne, le Conseil d’État valide le dispositif des joueurs issus des filières de formation mis en place par la Ligue nationale de rugby dans le championnat professionnel français.

en lire plus

Bail à construction

Sécurité sociale, accident du travail

Expropriation

Construction immobilière

Sécurité sociale, contentieux

Sécurité sociale, accident du travail

Sécurité sociale, cotisations et contributions du régime général

Sécurité sociale, accident du travail

Sécurité sociale, accident du travail

Sécurité sociale, cotisations et contributions du régime général

La finale du concours du « European Law Moot Court » aura lieu le 5 avril à la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne à Luxembourg