
A new edition of Geert van Calster’s European Private International Law. Commercial Litigation in the EU has just been published by Hart.
The third edition of the book is a valuable addition to the library of any scholar, practitioner and student interested in matters of Private International Law. The book can serve as a good introduction into the topic for non-EU readers and a refreshing text for those familiar with the EU reality. The author’s experience as a practitioner is a plus for the analysis the book provides. Specific insights into national case law developments on particular aspects of private international law add to the richness of information the reader gets. Compared with the previous edition, the updated text includes some new sections on the realities of Brexit for European Private International Law and developments of the Hague Conference of Private International Law.
The blurb reads:
This classic textbook provides a thorough overview of European private international law. It is essential reading for private international law students who need to study the European perspective in order to fully get to grips the subject.
Opening with foundational questions, it clearly explains the subject’s central tenets: the Brussels I, Rome I and Rome II Regulations (jurisdiction, applicable law for contracts and tort). Additional chapters explore the Succession Regulation, private international law and insolvency, freedom of establishment, and the impact of PIL on corporate social responsibility. The new edition includes a new chapter on the Hague instruments and an opening discussion on the impact of Brexit.
Drawing on the author’s rich experience, the new edition retains the book’s hallmarks of insight and clarity of expression ensuring it maintains its position as the leading textbook in the field.
More information about the book can be found here. The table of contents and a sample reading of the book are available here and here.
The publisher offers a 20% discount to the readers of the EAPIL blog who order the book online at www.hartpublishing.co.uk. Using the code UG7 at the checkout to benefit from the discount.
A quick post on an issue I actively published on last year, including with Kathleen Garnett: the innovation principle. My post here is a bit of a documentation gateway on same. I just wanted to draw readers’ attention to two developments.
First, the European Risk Forum which stood at the cradle of a proposed innovation ‘principle’ has been rebranded into the ‘European Regulation and Innovation Forum’ – ERIF. This of course even more than ‘Risk Forum’ is meant to conjure up positive feelings: who could possibly be against Regulation let alone innovation? It calls itself a think tank but it is in fact a trade association – interest group.
Further, the focus of the campaign has now changed. No longer it seems is the introduction of a new innovation principle the aim of the campaign. Rather, a restrictive take on regulation using cost benefit analysis and ‘proportionality’ – both existing principles of e.g. EU environmental law and at odds e.g. with the recently proposed essential use idea within the EU’s chemicals policy. It seems ERIF looks among others to the EU’s Regulatory Scrutiny Board to keep proposed laws in check.
Worth keeping an eye on, I suggest.
Geert.
La CJUE a tranché : la chasse traditionnelle à la glu (dite aussi « aux gluaux ») pratiquée dans cinq départements du sud de la France n’est pas autorisée par la directive Oiseaux.
Pourvoi c/ décision de la CA de Versailles des 23 juin 2020 et 16 juillet 2020
Pourvoi c/ décision Cour d'assises d'appel du Gard rendue le 17 novembre 2020
Pourvoi c/ décision CA de Montpellier du 7 décembre 2020
Pourvoi c/ CA de Poitiers du 23 novembre 2020
Pourvoi c/ arrêt CA de Paris (extradition) du 25 novembre 2020
Pourvoi c/ décision CA de Paris du 15 décembre 2020
Tribunal judiciaire d'Épinal, jugement du 11 février 2021
Tribunal judiciaire de Pontoise, 5 mars 2021
Pourvoi c/ ordonnance du Premier président de la CA de Limoges rendue le 25 novembre 2020
Pourvoi c/ Cour d'appel de Metz, 26 juin 2020
Tribunal de police de Tarbes, 4 mars 2021
Avis rendu par le Conseil de l'ordre des avocats au Conseil d'État et à la Cour de cassation du 19 novembre 2020
Pourvoi c/ jugement du Tribunal judiciaire de Bobigny rendu le 26 janvier 2021
Tribunal judiciaire de Narbonne, 18 février 2021
Pourvoi c/ chambre de l'instruction de la CA de Lyon du 27 octobre 2020
Pourvoi c/ chambre d'instruction de la CA de Toulouse du 22 janvier 2021
Pourvoi c/ déc. chambre instruction de la Cour d'appel de Paris du 21 janvier 2021
Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer