The last issue of the Revue critique de droit international privé will shortly be released. It contains several casenotes and an article, authored by Campbell McLachlan who is Professor of Law at Victoria University of Wellington (“Entre le conflit de lois, le droit international public et l’application internationale du droit public : le droit des relations externes des Etats »).
The abstract reads as follows:
The relationships between States and individuals of foreign nationality from the perspective of their constitutional rights and freedoms raise a series of issues that all States must resolve and that sit at the interface of the constitutional order of each of them and the intertional legal system through which they are connected. Today, this interface has progressively become porous, raising legal problems in increasing numbers and with increased frequency. The various responses generated thereby exercise a powerful influence over the legal imaginary, including on the ways in which a legal system represents its own relationship with the rest of the world. The thesis developed here is that such responses belong to a third discipline, in between the two traditional, public and private, branches of international law. This discipline can be called « the law of external relations », borrowing a term from one of the Restatements of the United States but little used in Europe. In what follows, the possible conceptions of this disciplinary field will be explored, along with its relationship to private international law.
A full table of contents is available here.
Non lieu à renvoi et irrecevabilité
L’article 4 du « règlement successions » s’oppose à une réglementation d’un État membre qui prévoit que, bien que le défunt n’eût pas, au moment de son décès, sa résidence habituelle dans cet État, ses juridictions sont compétentes pour la délivrance des certificats successoraux nationaux, dans le cadre d’une succession ayant une incidence transfrontalière, lorsque des biens successoraux sont situés sur le territoire de cet État membre.
Un signe consistant en une couleur appliquée sur la semelle d’une chaussure à talon haut n’est pas constitué exclusivement par la « forme ».
Non lieu à renvoi
By Frédéric Breger, Legal Officer at the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)
The Permanent Bureau of the HCCH has just released Volume XXII of the Judges’ Newsletter (Summer-Fall 2018) with a Special Focus on “The Child’s Voice – 15 Years Later”.
This “Anniversary” Volume was published in co-operation with Professor Marilyn Freeman (University of Westminster, London, England) and Associate Professor Nicola Taylor (University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand) in the context of their British Academy research grant on the objection of the child under Article 13(2) of the 1980 Child Abduction Convention. It gathers contributions from 25 authors (academics, lawyers, judges, mediators, psychologists…) and covering approximately 15 jurisdictions on the topic of the “objection of the child” exception. The objective of this publication is to share good practices on how to hear children in the context of a child abduction case; it further outlines examples of guidelines and normative work developed across jurisdictions in relation to the voice of the child.
A French version of this Volume will be available in October 2018. All previous volumes of the Judges’ Newsletter are available here.
Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer