Agrégateur de flux

Call for papers: Tangier Statute Centenary Conference, 18 December 2023, Tangier.

GAVC - ven, 12/16/2022 - 15:33

I do not often use pictures on the blog but this one is just too evocative to let pass:

On 18 December 2023 (i.e. a year from now), Willem Theus (KU Leuven – UCLouvain), Dr Michel Erpelding (University of Luxembourg), Prof Dr Francesco Tamburini (University of Pisa), Prof Dr Fouzi Rherrousse (University of Oujda), and myself are organising a conference to celebrate the centenary of the Statute of Tangier, signed at Paris. Credit for kicking off the process goes to Willem.

This treaty, signed between France, Spain and the United Kingdom, and later joined by Sweden, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal and Italy, provided for the creation of a new legal entity: the International Zone of Tangier. Established by 1925, the Tangier Zone was formally an integral part of Morocco, but subject to a special regime that left most of its institutions under the joint administration of several Western powers. This special regime would last until Morocco’s independence in 1956, with some international elements remaining in place under a Royal Charter until 1960.

Thinking about the Zone triggers an extravaganza of thoughts on international commercial courts, conflict of laws, history of law and so much more. The call asks for papers on

The Politics of Individual Powers Towards/Within the Zone
Moroccan Attitudes and Policies Towards/Within the Zone and Its Institutions
The Interzonal and Foreign Relations of the International Zone17
Politics in the International Legislative Assembly
The Veto-Role of the Committee of Control
The Zone’s Legal System/Codes
The Operation, Case Law and Reforms of the Mixed Court
The Bar of the International Zone

Careers of Individual Lawyers/Officials/Businessmen/Intermediaries
The Tangier Banking System
The Ecclesiastical, Jewish and Sharia Courts
The Working and Case Law of the American Consular Court
The Spanish Civil War and its Impact on the Zone
The Architecture of the International Administrative Buildings of the Zone
Smugglers and the Law; and
The Legal System of the Transition Period (1956–1960)

The call and further details are available in Arabic, English, French, Italian and Spanish.

Happy pondering abstracts!

Geert.

EU Legislative Priorities for 2023 and 2024: Joint Declaration of the Presidents of the Union’s Political Institutions

EAPIL blog - ven, 12/16/2022 - 13:00

As reported on this blog by Marco Pasqua, the European Commission adopted on 18 October 2022 its 2023 Work Programme, listing the legislative proposals, including in the area of private international law, that the Commission itself regarded as a priority.

On 15 December 2022, the Presidents of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission signed a Joint Declaration on EU legislative priorities for 2023 and 2024. The document, as indicated in the official press release, “sets out a shared European vision for a stronger and more resilient Europe in the face of Russia’s unprovoked, brutal aggression against Ukraine and its wide-ranging impact – all the while tackling other serious challenges such as the climate crisis and economic headwinds”.

The joint declaration is accompanied by a working document, which lists 164 “key legislative proposals”, that the three institutions agreed to prioritise.

Some of these proposals either primarily relate to private international law or include provisions that have, or may have, significant private international law implications.

These include the proposal for a Directive on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence; the proposal for a Directive harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law; the proposal for a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence; the proposal for a Directive on protecting persons who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings (SLAPPs); the proposal for a Regulation on the digitalisation of judicial cooperation and access to justice in cross-border civil, commercial and criminal matters; and the proposal for a Regulation on the law applicable to the third-party effects of assignments of claims.

The recently adopted proposal for a Regulation aimed at harmonising at EU level the rules of private international law relating to parenthood (which Marta Requejo presented here) is not among those listed in the document.

There is also no reference to the expected developments regarding the international protection of adults.

European Commission Proposal for a Regulation on Private International Law Rules Relating to Parenthood

Conflictoflaws - ven, 12/16/2022 - 12:42

This piece was written by Helga Luku, PhD researcher at the University of Antwerp

On 7 December 2022, the European Commission adopted a Proposal for a Regulation which aims to harmonize at the EU level the rules of private international law with regard to parenthood. This proposal aims to provide legal certainty and predictability for families in cross-border situations. They currently face administrative burdens when they travel, move or reside in another Member State (for family or professional reasons), and seek to have parenthood recognised in this other Member State. The proposal follows on a declaration two years ago by the Commission President von der Leyen in her State of the Union address that “If you are a parent in one country, you are a parent in every country”.

How will this proposal change the current situation?  

In line with the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU, Member States are required to recognise parenthood for the purpose of the rights that the child derives from Union law, permitting a child who is a Union citizen, to exercise without impediment, with each parent, the right to move and reside freely within the territory of Member States. Thus, parenthood established in one Member State should be recognised in other Member States for some (limited) purposes. There is currently no specific EU legislation that requires Member States to recognise parenthood established in other Member States for all purposes.

Different substantive and conflict-of-law rules of Member States on the establishment and recognition of parenthood can lead to a denial of the rights that children derive from national law, such as their succession or maintenance rights, or their right to have any one of their parents act as their legal representative in another Member State on matters such as medical treatment or schooling. Thus, the proposal aims to protect the fundamental rights of children and as it is claimed by the Commission, to be in full compliance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Through the proposed Regulation, the Commission intends to enable children, who move within the Union to benefit from the rights that derive from national law, regardless of:

  • the nationality of the children or the parents (on the condition that the document that establishes or proves the parenthood is issued in a Member State);
  • how the child was conceived or born (thus including conception with assisted reproductive technology);
  • the type of family of the child (including e.g. the recognition of same-sex parenthood or parenthood established through adoption).

In principle, the proposal does not interfere with substantive national law in matters related to parenthood, which are and will remain under the competence of Member States. However, by putting the children’s rights and best interests in the spotlight of the proposal, the Commission is requiring Member States to disregard their reluctance toward the recognition of some types of parenthood.

As the Union aspires an area of freedom and justice, in which the free movement of persons, access to justice and full respect of fundamental rights are guaranteed, the Commission proposes the adoption of Union rules on international jurisdiction and applicable law in order to facilitate the recognition of parenthood among the Member States. It covers not only the recognition of judgments but also the recognition and acceptance of authentic instruments. In this sense, the proposal covers the three main pillars of private international law and it will also introduce a European Certificate on Parenthood.

The main aspects of this proposal include:

  • Jurisdiction: jurisdiction shall lie alternatively with the Member State of habitual residence of the child, of the nationality of the child, of the habitual residence of the respondent (e.g. the person in respect of whom the child claims parenthood), of the habitual residence of any one of the parents, of the nationality of any one of the parents, or of the birth of the child. Party autonomy is excluded. (Chapter II, articles 6-15)
  • The applicable law: as a rule, the law applicable to the establishment of parenthood should be the law of the State of the habitual residence of the person giving birth. If the habitual residence of the person giving birth cannot be established, then the law of the State of the birth of the child should apply. Exceptions are foreseen for the situation where the parenthood of a second person cannot be established under the applicable law. (Chapter III, articles 16-23).
  • Recognition: the proposal provides for the recognition of court decisions and authentic instruments with binding legal effects, which establish parenthood, without any special procedure being required. However, if one of the limited grounds for refusal is found to exist, competent authorities of Member States can refuse the recognition of parenthood established by a court decision or an authentic instrument with binding effects. (Chapter IV, articles 24-43)
  • Acceptance: the proposal also provides for the acceptance of authentic instruments with no binding legal effect. These instruments do not have a binding legal effect because they do not establish parenthood, but they refer to its prior establishment by other means or to other facts, thereby having only evidentiary effects. It may be a birth certificate, a parenthood certificate, an extract of birth from the register or any other form. The acceptance of these instruments with evidentiary effects can be refused only on public policy grounds. (Chapter V, articles 44-45)
  • Creation of a European Certificate of Parenthood: children or their legal representatives can request it from the Member State in which the parenthood was established. This Certificate will be issued in a uniform standard form and will be available in all Union languages. It is not mandatory but children or their legal representatives have the right to request it and have it recognised in all Member States (chapter VI, articles 46-57).

What is next?

Since the current proposal concerns family law issues with cross-border implications, under Article 81(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Council shall act unanimously via a special legislative procedure after consulting the European Parliament. Besides the sensitive area the proposal regulates, it also adopts a pro-diversity and non-discrimination policy, including the recognition of same-sex parenthood and surrogacy. Thus, considering the different approaches and national identities of Member States, often associated with their more conservative or liberal convictions, unanimity will not be easy to reach. However, if unanimity cannot be reached, a number of Member States can still adopt the proposal in enhanced cooperation (see: Article 20 Treaty on European Union). This is not an uncommon procedure for Member States when they have to adopt legislation that concerns family law issues, e.g. Regulation 1259/2010 on the law applicable to divorce and legal separation (Rome III) and Regulation 2016/1103 on jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes. However, if it happens that the proposal is adopted in enhanced cooperation, it is doubtful whether its objective to provide the same rights for all children is truly achieved. Additionally, the participating Member States will probably include those that did not impose very restrictive requirements with regard to the recognition of parenthood in their national laws, even before the adoption of the Regulation in enhanced cooperation.

200/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Arrêt de la Cour de justice dans l'affaire C-311/21

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - ven, 12/16/2022 - 10:34
TimePartner Personalmanagement
Une convention collective qui minore la rémunération des intérimaires par rapport aux travailleurs recrutés directement doit prévoir des avantages compensatoires
A collective agreement which reduces the pay of temporary agency workers compared to workers recruited directly must provide for countervailing benefits

Catégories: Flux européens

200/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Arrêt de la Cour de justice dans l'affaire C-311/21

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - ven, 12/16/2022 - 10:34
TimePartner Personalmanagement
Une convention collective qui minore la rémunération des intérimaires par rapport aux travailleurs recrutés directement doit prévoir des avantages compensatoires
A collective agreement which reduces the pay of temporary agency workers compared to workers recruited directly must provide for countervailing benefits

Catégories: Flux européens

200/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Arrêt de la Cour de justice dans l'affaire C-311/21

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - ven, 12/16/2022 - 10:34
TimePartner Personalmanagement
Une convention collective qui minore la rémunération des intérimaires par rapport aux travailleurs recrutés directement doit prévoir des avantages compensatoires

Catégories: Flux européens

Rabels Zeitschrift: Issue 4 of 2022

EAPIL blog - ven, 12/16/2022 - 08:00

The latest issue of the RabelsZ (Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht) has been published. As always, it contains a number of insightful articles. Here are the authors, titles and abstracts:

Moritz Renner and Torsten Kindt, Internationales Gesellschaftsrecht und Investitionsschutzrecht (Conflict of Corporate Laws and International Investment Law)

The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU has revived the debate on the conflict of corporate laws. Much attention has recently been given to the new generation of EU free trade agreements, such as the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, but their impact on conflicts in the field of corporate law remains unclear. This article proposes that the conflict-of-law effects of these agreements can be fully understood only in the light of their common background in international investment law. Building upon an analysis of the role of treaties in Germany’s conflict-of-law system and of the multiple intersections between the conflict of corporate laws and international investment law in general, the article demonstrates that the newest EU free trade agreements imply in particular the application of a restricted conflict-of-law theory of incorporation on foreign corporations originating from the respective signatory states. While the agreements’ effects on conflicts in the corporate law arena are not as far reaching as those of the EU’s freedom of establishment, they nevertheless further narrow the remaining scope of application of the traditional seat theory underlying Germany’s autonomous rules on conflicts vis-à-vis corporate law.

Tobias Lutzi and Felix M. Wilke, Brüssel Ia extendenda est? – Zur Zukunft der internationalen Zuständigkeit deutscher Gerichte in Zivil- und Handelssachen nach Ausweitung der EuGVVO (Brussels I bis extendenda est? On the Future of the International Jurisdiction of German Courts in Civil and Commercial Matters after an Extension of the Regulation)

With the expiry of the deadline of art. 79 Brussels I bis, the academic debate on a possible further extension of the Regulation to situations involving non-EU defendants is (again) gaining momentum. The present study aims to contribute to this discussion. It compares the relevant German rules on international jurisdiction over non-EU defendants with those of the Brussels I bis Regulation in order to be able to assess the consequences of a possible extension from a German perspective. The study reveals that even replacing the national rules in their entirety would not amount to a radical change. In particular, the addition of typified places of performance under art. 7 no. 1 lit. b Brussels I bis to the forum contractus and the availability of a common forum for joint defendants under art. 8 no. 1 Brussels I bis would constitute welcome improvements of the current framework. The loss of jurisdiction based on the presence of assets under § 23 ZPO would arguably be a disadvantage if not properly compensated for, e.g. through a forum necessitatis provision. The biggest advantage, though, would most likely be the harmonization of the law of international jurisdiction across the EU – which, from a German perspective, would come at a rather reasonable price.

Ulla Liukkunen, Decent Work and Private International Law (Open Access)

This article examines the decent work objective set by the ILO and UN Agenda 2030 from the point of view of private international law. It conceptualizes decent work, arguing that inclusivity of protective safeguards and structures in cross-border situations is essential to achieving the objective, and that the need for inclusivity draws attention to the relationship between labour law and private international law. The analysis offered also introduces a migration law-related perspective on decent work and the private international law of employment contracts and labour relations more generally. It is argued that understanding that the idea of inclusivity is embedded in the decent work objective brings up a global dimension which calls for uniform regulatory solutions at the international level. Decent work could be coupled relatively easily with the need for a revival of the private international law of labour relations and for developing a labour rights-based approach in private international law. It also connects private international law’s protective normative frameworks to the body of international labour standards.

Adrian Hemler, Virtuelle Verfahrensteilnahme aus dem Ausland und Souveränität des fremden Aufenthaltsstaats – Zugleich ein Beitrag zum Verhältnis des Völkerrechts zum Kollisionsrecht (Virtual Participation in Court Proceedings from Abroad and Its Effects on the Sovereignty of the Foreign State of Residence – With Consideration of the Relationship Between Public International Law and the Conflict of Laws)

Most German-speaking scholars and some German courts consider participation in virtual court proceedings from a foreign state of residence to be a violation of foreign sovereignty. This essay stakes out a contrary position. In reaching this conclusion, it focuses on the distinction between the exercise of state power abroad and the exercise of state power regarding foreign facts. Especially with regards to extraterritorial legislation, it is argued that the law’s scope of sovereign validity remains territorial even if its scope of application covers facts abroad. The discussion also shows how this distinction is equally applicable to court judgments that concern foreign elements. Furthermore, the article discusses the nature of public international law principles regarding extraterritorial legislation and their relationship to national conflict of laws provisions. Also considered is how the sovereignty principle ought to be understood in cyberspace. Having established this theoretical foundation, it is concluded that regardless of the procedural role of the respective party, participation in virtual court proceedings from a foreign state of residence does not amount to a violation of foreign sovereignty.

Corinna Coupette and Dirk Hartung, Rechtsstrukturvergleichung (Structural Comparative Law) (Open Access)

Structural comparative law explores the similarities and differences between the structures of legal systems. Theoretically grounded in systems theory and complexity science, it models legal systems as networks of documents, organizations, and individuals. Using methods from network analysis, structural comparative law measures these networks, assesses how they change over time, and draws quantitative comparisons between multiple legal systems. It differs from other approaches in its assumptions, its methods, and its goals, in that it acknowledges the relevance of dependencies between system entities and borrows more heavily from data science than from econometrics. Structural comparative law constitutes a novel addition to the comparatist’s toolbox, and it opens myriad opportunities for further research at the intersection of comparative law and data science.

Arseny Shevelev and Georgy Shevelev, Proprietary Status of the Whole Body of a Living Person

This article is a reaction to the growing economic significance of the living human body as well as its legal status. In this paper, we argue that ownership in the human body most effectively guarantees the autonomy of the human will as to the use and disposal of one’s own body, but classical ownership theory is unable to fully ensure the autonomy of the human will, since it risks reviving the institution of slavery. We will demonstrate that theories establishing rights to the body other than ownership rights are limited in content and are inherently inconsistent. At the end of the article, we will propose an abstract ownership theory that allows for the exercise of maximum freedom to dispose of the human body while one is alive and which will be devoid of the flaws of the preceding theories.

The table of contents in German is available here.

Petite pause hivernale

La rédaction de Dalloz actualité prend ses quartiers d’hiver, le temps des fêtes de fin d’année bien méritées !

Nous serons de retour dès le mardi 3 janvier 2023.

Merci de votre fidélité et joyeuses fêtes !

en lire plus

Catégories: Flux français

Fourth Issue of Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law

Conflictoflaws - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 13:40

The fourth issue of Gravitas Review of Business & Property Law was published this week. It contains the following private international law article:

UV Obi (SAN) et al, “The Enforcement of Foreign Jurisdiction Clauses of Contracts in Nigeria”

The inclusion of foreign jurisdiction clauses in contracts has become a common
trend in international commercial transactions. Since most parties are often not
familiar with the laws of their foreign counterparts and are sceptical about getting a
fair trial in the latter’s jurisdiction when a dispute arises from the contract, the
option of a usually neutral foreign jurisdiction clause, therefore, is cardinal when
considering the risks associated with contractual relationships. In this article, the
Authors consider, inter alia, the meaning and nature of contracts, foreign
jurisdiction clause as a term of a contract, its enforcement in both England and
Nigeria, with a particular focus on the attitude of Nigerian Courts to the
enforcement of foreign jurisdiction clause as a term of a contract. The Authors
opine that while the Supreme Court has consistently upheld and enforced foreign
jurisdiction clauses, the lower courts have often refused to do so because they
perceive those clauses to be ouster clauses. The Authors recommend enacting
legislation and practice direction to uphold parties’ freedom of contract, including
parties’ rights to subject their disputes to the laws and country of their choice. This
will no doubt result in a more predictable outcome of international commercial
contracts litigations and related issues in Nigeria, engender trust in our judicial
system, promote party autonomy, strengthen the parties’ existing rights, promote
access to justice, and strengthen our legal system.

204/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans l'affaire C-124/21 P

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:26
International Skating Union / Commission
Concurrence
L’avocat général Rantos propose d’annuler l’arrêt du Tribunal qui avait confirmé le caractère anticoncurrentiel des règles de l’Union internationale de patinage

Catégories: Flux européens

204/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans l'affaire C-124/21 P

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:26
International Skating Union / Commission
Concurrence
L’avocat général Rantos propose d’annuler l’arrêt du Tribunal qui avait confirmé le caractère anticoncurrentiel des règles de l’Union internationale de patinage

Catégories: Flux européens

204/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans l'affaire C-124/21 P

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:26
International Skating Union / Commission
Concurrence
L’avocat général Rantos propose d’annuler l’arrêt du Tribunal qui avait confirmé le caractère anticoncurrentiel des règles de l’Union internationale de patinage

Catégories: Flux européens

204/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans l'affaire C-124/21 P

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:26
International Skating Union / Commission
Concurrence
L’avocat général Rantos propose d’annuler l’arrêt du Tribunal qui avait confirmé le caractère anticoncurrentiel des règles de l’Union internationale de patinage

Catégories: Flux européens

204/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans l'affaire C-124/21 P

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:26
International Skating Union / Commission
Concurrence
L’avocat général Rantos propose d’annuler l’arrêt du Tribunal qui avait confirmé le caractère anticoncurrentiel des règles de l’Union internationale de patinage

Catégories: Flux européens

203/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans les affaires jointes C-615/20, C-671/20

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:17
YP e.a. (Levée d’immunité et suspension d’un juge)
Avocat général Collins : seul un tribunal indépendant et impartial, établi préalablement par la loi peut autoriser des poursuites pénales à l’égard d’un juge

Catégories: Flux européens

203/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans les affaires jointes C-615/20, C-671/20

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:17
YP e.a. (Levée d’immunité et suspension d’un juge)
Avocat général Collins : seul un tribunal indépendant et impartial, établi préalablement par la loi peut autoriser des poursuites pénales à l’égard d’un juge

Catégories: Flux européens

203/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans les affaires jointes C-615/20, C-671/20

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:17
YP e.a. (Levée d’immunité et suspension d’un juge)
Avocat général Collins : seul un tribunal indépendant et impartial, établi préalablement par la loi peut autoriser des poursuites pénales à l’égard d’un juge

Catégories: Flux européens

203/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans les affaires jointes C-615/20, C-671/20

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:17
YP e.a. (Levée d’immunité et suspension d’un juge)
Avocat général Collins : seul un tribunal indépendant et impartial, établi préalablement par la loi peut autoriser des poursuites pénales à l’égard d’un juge

Catégories: Flux européens

203/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans les affaires jointes C-615/20, C-671/20

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:17
YP e.a. (Levée d’immunité et suspension d’un juge)
Avocat général Collins : seul un tribunal indépendant et impartial, établi préalablement par la loi peut autoriser des poursuites pénales à l’égard d’un juge

Catégories: Flux européens

202/2022 : 15 décembre 2022 - Conclusions de l'avocat général dans les affaires jointes C-181/21, C-269/21

Communiqués de presse CVRIA - jeu, 12/15/2022 - 12:16
G. (Nomination des juges de droit commun en Pologne)
Principes du droit communautaire
Advocate General Collins: the requirement of prior establishment by law applies to all Member State courts and tribunals

Catégories: Flux européens

Pages

Sites de l’Union Européenne

 

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer