Arbitrage
Contrat de travail, rupture
Cour d'appel de Rennes, Chambre spéciale des mineurs, 17 juin 2016
Tribunal de grande instance de Fort de France, Commission d'indemnisation des victimes d'infractions, 17 juin 2016
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
A new session within the series Seminario Julio D. González Campos, organized by the Department of Private International Law of the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, will be held on July 8th, 2016, starting at 10:30 pm. The speaker will be Dr. Matthias Weller, Professor of Civil Law, Civil Procedural Law and Private International Law at the EBS Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht; he will address the topic “Mutual Trust: Still Corner Stone for Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters after the Brexit?”
Venue: Seminar room V (4th Floor), Faculty of Law.
For further information please contact mariajesus.elvira@uam.es.
The Max Planck Institute Luxembourg, heading an international consortium, is undertaking a study, funded by the European Commission, aiming to assess the impact of domestic laws of civil procedure of the 28 Member States on mutual trust and the free circulation of judgements, as well as on the enforcement of consumer rights derived from EU law.
As a part of this project, a public consultation has been launched for gathering data and opinions among stakeholders.
Direct access to the two online questionnaires, which mirror the two separate strands of the study, are currently available (in six languages) here.
The Institute encourages consumers, lawyers, judges, academics, consumer protection associations, business/trade associations, dispute resolution facilitators, and those working in other legal professions to respond to both questionnaires.
For those wishing to offer further insights on any of the topics covered by the study, it will be possible to leave the contact details at the end of the survey so as to be contacted for an interview.
Le Premier ministre était à l’Assemblée nationale mardi 28 juin 2016 pour son premier discours officiel après le vote des Britanniques pour la sortie de l’Union Européenne. « Il faut respecter ce choix démocratique » reconnaît-il, tout en pressant le parlement britannique de déclencher l’article 50 « le plus tôt possible ».
Le délai raisonnable prévu par l’article 5, § 3, de la Convention européenne s’applique en matière d’extradition. La chambre criminelle juge par ailleurs sérieuse une QPC mettant en cause le régime du placement sous écrou extraditionnel.
Les conditions selon lesquelles, en cas de jugement par défaut, une créance est réputée « incontestée », au sens de l’article 3 du règlement du 21 avril 2004, portant création d’un titre exécutoire européen pour les créances incontestées, doivent être déterminées de manière autonome, en vertu de ce seul règlement.
Dans le cadre de ses décisions prises en vertu du contrôle de la bonne application de la législation de l’Union, la Commission européenne a entamé le 16 juin 2016, de nouvelles phases de procédures d’infraction à l’encontre de la France dans le domaine de l’environnement et des transports routiers.
Following the United Kingdom’s popular vote to exit the European Union, a very timely book on the various legal, political and economic impacts of Brexit has just been released: “Britain Alone! The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU” (Kluwer Law International 2016), edited by Professor Patrick Birkinshaw (Institute of European Public Law, University of Hull) and Professor Andrea Biondi (King’s College London), covers practical topics such as the options available to the UK, the effects of Brexit on the constitutional level, the existing and potential role of jurisprudence, post-Brexit residence and labour rights as well as financial and economic governance.
The table of contents reads as follows:
Introduction
Patrick Birkinshaw & Andrea Biondi.
Part I Constitutional Issues
CHAPTER 1 Britain Alone Constitutionally: Brexit and Restitutio in Integrum
Patrick Birkinshaw & Mike Varney.
CHAPTER 2 A Tale of Two Referendums: Scotland, the UK and Europe
Stephen Tierney & Katie Boyle.
CHAPTER 3 ‘Britain Alone’: A View from Northern Ireland
Gordon Anthony.
CHAPTER 4 ‘Brexit’ and Welsh Devolution: The Likely Impact
Mike Varney.
CHAPTER 5 Responsibility, Voice and Exit: Britain Alone?
Paul Craig.
Part II Managing Alone?
CHAPTER 6 Which Options would Be Available for the United Kingdom in the Case of a Withdrawal from the EU?
Jean-Claude Piris.
CHAPTER 7 The UK and the World: Environmental Law
Ioanna Hadjiyianni.
CHAPTER 8 The EU’s External Relations: A Question of Competence
Daniel Denman.
CHAPTER 9 Judicial Protection and the UK’s Opt-Outs: Is Britain Alone in the CJEU?
Maria Kendrick.
CHAPTER 10 Criminal Law
John R. Spencer.
CHAPTER 11 From EU Citizens to Third-Country Nationals: The Legacy of Polydor
Marja-Liisa Öberg.
CHAPTER 12 Britain Alone! The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the European Union: Social Policies
Aileen McColgan.
CHAPTER 13 The Death of Social Europe
Keith D. Ewing.
CHAPTER 14 The United Kingdom without the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: Putting Down the Dog That Did Not Bark?
Kieron Beal QC.
CHAPTER 15 State Aid Control, Government Spending and the Virtue of Loyalty
Andrea Biondi.
CHAPTER 16 Differentiated Integration and the Single Supervisory Mechanism: Which Way Forward for the European Banking Authority?
Pierre Schammo.
For further information, please see the publisher’s website.
Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer