Action civile
After April Fools’ Day in the House of Commons, stepping up preparations for a no-deal Brexit has become more important than ever. Insofar, it should be noted that not only the EU Commission has been active in this regard (see our earlier posts here and here), but that national legislators are bracing for the fallout from a hard Brexit as well. On 29 March 2019, the German law on Brexit-related measures in the field of taxation entered into force. In spite of its bland title, this law goes far beyond tax law and includes transitory provisions in a number of important areas of business law, ranging from banking to insurance and securities law. Most articles provide that German authorities may order that British companies will be treated like EU companies for a transition period no longer than 21 months in case of a hard Brexit. By such an extension, the German legislature hopes to buffer the economic shocks that may arise in the absence of a withdrawal agreement.
Pourvoi c. Cour d'appel de Paris, 28 septembre 2018
Pourvoi c. Cour d'appel de Pau, 20 septembre 2018
Pourvoi c. Cour d'appel d'Angers, 2 octobre 2018
TGI de Meaux, 25 mars 2019
En application de la Convention d’aide mutuelle franco-marocaine du 5 octobre 1957, une demande d’exequatur d’un jugement marocain ayant constaté, après enquête, qu’un enfant était né de la femme désignée ne peut pas être rejetée, sauf à procéder à une révision au fond prohibée, au motif qu’il existe des doutes sérieux sur la grossesse de cette femme.
La Cour de justice de l’Union européenne juge qu’un mineur pris en charge dans le cadre du régime de la kafala algérienne par un citoyen de l’Union ne peut pas être regardé comme un « descendant direct » de ce citoyen.
Dr. Marlene Brosch (Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law) recently published a book on Choice of Law Agreements and Jurisdictional Agreements in EU International Family Law and Succession Law.
Here is a brief overview provided by the author:
Choice of Law Agreements and Choice of Court Agreements are fundamental legal instruments in Private International Law, expressing the parties’ autonomy to determine the applicable law and the competent court(s). In the field of Family Law and Succession Law, party autonomy has only recently taken root through the enactment of several EU Regulations that recognise limited party autonomy: Rome III, Brussels II-bis, Maintenance Regulation, Succession Regulation, as well as the Regulations on Matrimonial Property Regimes and Property Regimes of Registered Partnerships.
The book constitutes an in-depth comparison of the rules on party autonomy in the aforementioned legal instruments from a functional and systematic perspective. Special regard is given to the interrelations between applicable law and jurisdiction. This comparative analysis serves as the starting point for
assessing inconsistencies and deficiencies, which further lead to discussing reform proposals for a more coherent normative system.
More information can be found at https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/book/rechtswahl-und-gerichtsstandsvereinbarung-im-internationalen-familien-und-erbrecht-der-eu-9783161562730?no_cache=1 .
Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer