Agrégateur de flux

Sécurité sociale

Many thanks to KU Leuven law student Dzsenifer Orosz (she is writing a paper on the issues for one of my conflict of laws courses) for alerting me to the French Conseil D’Etat having referred ‘right to be forgotten’ issues to the European Court of Justice.  I have of course on occasion reported the application of data protection laws /privacy issues on this blog (try ‘Google’ as a search on the blog’s search function). I also have a paper out on the case against applying the right to be forgotten to the .com domain, and with co-authors, one where we catalogue the application of RTBF until December 2016. See also my post on the Koln courts refusing application to .com.

The Conseil d’Etat has referred one or two specific Qs but also, just to be sure, has also asked the Court of Justice for general insight into how data protection laws apply to the internet. The Court is unlikely to offer such tutorial (not that it would not be useful). However any Advocate General’s opinion of course will offer 360 insight.

One to look forward to.

Geert.

 

Parental Care and the Best Interests of the Child in Muslim Countries, edited by / a cura di Nadjma Yassari, Lena-Maria Möller, Imen Gallala-Arndt, SPringer, 2017, ISBN 9789462651739, pp. 353, EUR 145,59

 

This book is the first analysis of parental care regimes in Muslim jurisdictions, both in a comparative and country-specific sense. It contains the proceedings of a workshop on Parental Care and the Best Interests of the Child in Muslim Countries that the Max Planck Research Group “Changes in God’s Law: An Inner-Islamic Comparison of Family and Succession Law” hosted in Rabat, Morocco in April 2015. This workshop saw a total of 15 country reports presented on questions of custody, guardianship and their development within different Muslim jurisdictions (ranging from Indonesia to Morocco), a number of which are included in full in the book. Each of these country reports contains a historical perspective on the evolution of domestic rules regarding custody and guardianship, and on the introduction and development of the notion of the best interests of the child. Most importantly, the prevailing legal norms, both substantive and procedural, are explored and particular attention is given to legal practice and the role of the judiciary. In addition to a selection of country reports from the workshop, the volume includes two comparative analyses on questions of parental care in both public and private international law. With a high practical relevance for legal practitioners working in the area of cross-border custody disputes and the most up-to-date assessment of parental care regimes beyond a pure analysis of statutory law, this book combines a number of country reports authored by experts who have worked or are still based in the respective countries they are reporting on and thus contains in-depth discussions of legal practice and custody law in action.

Venerdì 30 giugno 2017 si terrà a Torino un convegno intitolato Il riconoscimento e l’esecuzione di decisioni e lodi arbitrali stranieri: trends e sviluppi recenti, organizzato dell’Union Internationale des Avocats, dall’Ordine degli Avvocati di Torino e dal Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Torino.

La locandina dell’evento è disponibile qui.

Par une décision communiquée le 13 avril 2017, la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (CEDH) rejette une requête relative à la durée excessive d’une procédure de liquidation pour non-épuisement des voies de recours internes, constatant le revirement de jurisprudence opéré par la Cour de cassation en la matière.

en lire plus

Entreprises en difficulté

Contrat d'entreprise

Contrat d'entreprise - Responsabilité délictuelle ou quasi-délictuelle

Contrat d'entreprise

Prêt - Intérêts - Taux effectif global

Entreprises en difficulté

Makhlouf / Conseil
Relations extérieures
Le Tribunal de l’UE confirme que le gel de fonds prononcé à l’encontre de Rami Makhlouf, cousin de Bachar al-Assad, doit être maintenu pour la période 2016-2017

En cas de litispendance, la date à laquelle a été engagée une procédure tendant à obtenir une mesure d’instruction avant tout procès ne peut pas constituer la date à laquelle « est réputée saisie », au sens de l’article 30, point 1, du règlement Bruxelles I, une juridiction appelée à statuer sur une demande au fond formée dans le même État membre consécutivement au résultat de cette mesure.

en lire plus

Copropriété - Propriété

Entreprises en difficulté

Étrangers - rétention - Contrôle d'identité

This is one for the conflict of laws anoraks. In C-29/16 HanseYachts the Court of Justice held (on 4 May) that an application for proceedings to preserve or establish, prior to any legal proceedings, evidence of facts on which a subsequent action could be based, does not constitute a proceeding within the meaning of (now) Article 32(1) Brussels I. If it had, it would trigger the lis alibi pendens regime of that Article, impacting therefore on any future substantive proceedings.

At 33 the Court defers to the insight into the relevant provisions of French judicial procedure, offered by the French Government: Although there may indeed be a connection between the court seised on the basis of that article and the court having jurisdiction to hear the substance of the case with a view to which the measure of inquiry was ordered, the fact remains that such proceedings for the taking of evidence are independent in relation to the substantive procedure which may, if necessary, be brought subsequently. The Court’s ruling however is dependent (at 34) upon the French courts confirming this interpretation of French civil procedure: for the CJEU does not offer final interpretations on internal State law.

Geert.

(Handbook of) EU Private International Law, 2nd ed. 2016, Chapter 2, Heading 2.2.14.1.

 

La Commission européenne a publié à la fin du mois d’avril le tableau de bord 2017 de la justice dans l’Union européenne, qui présente les données de chaque pays de l’Union concernant l’efficacité, la qualité et l’indépendance de leurs systèmes de justice respectifs.

Cet outil statistique, élaboré à partir des données transmises chaque année par les pays membres et par les données recueillies par la Commission vise à permettre aux autorités nationales d’améliorer l’effectivité des systèmes de justice.

Cette cinquième édition se penche plus particulièrement sur plusieurs points :

en lire plus

Doit être cassé l’arrêt qui rejette une demande d’exequatur d’un jugement israélien pour fraude, alors que le litige présentait des liens caractérisés avec Israël et que le juge israélien n’avait pas été saisi pour faire échec à une procédure engagée en France ou à une décision française.

en lire plus

Non lieu à renvoi