Agrégateur de flux

Visite à la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne d'une délégation de la Cour suprême des États-Unis d'Amérique dans le cadre du « Forum de Luxembourg »

Angola deposited its instrument of accession to the 1993 Adoption Convention on 14 March 2024. According to Article 46(2)(a), and as notified by the Depositary (i.e. the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands), this Convention entered into force for Angola on 1 July 2024.

The Depositary provided a six-month period to file objections in accordance with Article 44(3) of the Adoption Convention, which ended on 18 September 2024.

Germany filed an objection on 27 August 2024 and the Netherlands on 17 September 2024. As a result, the Adoption Convention did not enter into force between Angola and those States. For more information, click here.

Interestingly, under this Convention there is approximately a 3-month gap between the date of entering into force and the ending of the objection period.

 

Aldi Süd
Environnement et consommateurs
Une réduction de prix annoncée dans une publicité doit être calculée sur la base du prix le plus bas des 30 derniers jours

Puigdemont i Casamajó et Comín i Oliveres / Parlement
Droit institutionnel
La Cour de justice rejette définitivement le recours de MM. Puigdemont et Comín contre le refus du président du Parlement européen de leur reconnaître la qualité de députés européens en juin 2019

Energotehnica
Droit à un recours effectif : un juge national n’est pas tenu d’appliquer une décision de sa Cour constitutionnelle qui enfreint le droit de l’Union

Land Hessen (Obligation d’agir de l’autorité de protection des données)
Principes du droit communautaire
Protection des données à caractère personnel : l’autorité de contrôle n’est pas obligée de prendre une mesure correctrice dans tous les cas de violation ni, en particulier, d’imposer une amende

Emre Esen (Istanbul University) and Melis Avşar (Istanbul University) authored Private International Law in Türkiye with Istanbul University Press. The authors explain that, while teaching private international law in English to Erasmus students at Istanbul University’s Faculty of Law, they noticed a gap: despite the availability of numerous resources on private international law in Turkish, […]

Après l’audience de grande chambre en janvier dernier, l’arrêt était attendu. Nous avions vu la requérante, assise aux côtés de ses avocats, hocher la tête lorsqu’ils confirmaient qu’elle avait pleinement conscience que son refus de toute transfusion sanguine aurait pu la conduire à la mort. Les débats avaient ouvert de grandes et difficiles questions que les juges européens ne pouvaient ignorer.  

en lire plus

The book Derecho de familia internacional en un contexto de creciente migración: cuestiones vinculadas con el reglamento 2019/1111 has just been released by Aranzadi. The director of the book is Professor Beatriz Campuzano Díaz. It is open access, click here.

The table of contents is as follows (underlined the only article in English):

I PARTE. CUESTIONES VINCULADAS CON EL ÁMBITO DE APLICACIÓN

Tratamiento de la diversidad de estructuras familiares en los reglamentos europeos y continuidad del estatuto personal

Mª Ángeles Sánchez Jiménez

La filiación en el DIPr de la UE: entre la situación actual y las perspectivas de cambio

Beatriz Campuzano Díaz

II PARTE. CUESTIONES VINCULADAS CON LAS NORMAS DE COMPETENCIA JUDICIAL INTERNACIONAL

Los mecanismos de solución de la litispendencia internacional en materia de responsabilidad parental y la comprobación de la competencia judicial internacional. Perspectiva española

Elena Cano Bazaga

III PARTE. CUESTIONES VINCULADAS CON LA SUSTRACCIÓN INTERNACIONAL DE MENORES

El derecho del menor a ser oído y su articulación en el Derecho procesal español. Especial referencia al procedimiento de restitución o retorno

Pilar Martín-Ríos

Análisis de la jurisprudencia sobre el procedimiento de restitución de menores y su regulación en la LEC

Antonio Jesús Calzado Llamas

Problems related to the procedure of minors´returning decisions, with reference to Polish law

Monika Walachowska

IV PARTE. CUESTIONES VINCULADAS CON LA EFICACIA EXTRATERRITORIAL DE RESOLUCIONES, DOCUMENTOS PÚBLICOS Y ACUERDOS

Medidas para facilitar la aplicación en España de las normas sobre reconocimiento y ejecución del Reglamento 2019/1111: propuestas de lege ferenda

María Ángeles Rodríguez Vázquez

Mediación en procesos de responsabilidad parental

Antonia Durán Ayago

V PARTE. LAS RELACIONES CON TERCEROS PAÍSES

Cooperación judicial internacional en materia matrimonial y de responsabilidad parental con el Reino Unido y Gibraltar después del Brexit

Miguel Checa Martínez

El reconocimiento del divorcio marroquí en España. El método comparado como alternativa

Salma El Ouazzani Chahdi

Las resoluciones sobre filiación y las relaciones paternofiliales dictadas por las autoridades españolas y su incidencia en los ordenamientos jurídico español y marroquí: una perspectiva de género

Mª Dolores Adam Muñoz

El papel de las autoridades brasileñas en la lucha contra la sustracción internacional de niños

Aline Beltrame de Moura, Fellipe Leal

VI PARTE. MENORES, FAMILIA, DERECHO DE EXTRANJERÍA Y PROTECCIÓN INTERNACIONAL

¿Novedades en el Derecho de familia de los extranjeros en España? Un nuevo derecho “de familias” también para los extranjeros en España

Elena López Barba

Menores refugiados, una aproximación a las medidas de protección: del Reglamento Dublín al Reglamento Bruselas, pasando por Ucrania

Casilda Rueda Fernández

El derecho de la infancia migrante no acompañada a reunirse con sus familiares en situaciones fronterizas

Lucía Ione Padilla Espinosa

Protección de menores víctimas de matrimonios forzados en el derecho migratorio de la Unión Europea. Especial referencia al derecho de reagrupación familiar

Cristina María Zamora Gómez

El Derecho Internacional Privado y su incidencia en la protección jurídica de las mujeres víctimas de violencia de género. Especial referencia al Reglamento 2019/1111

Juana de los Ángeles Toledo Larrea

 

 

 

 

On 26 and 27 June 2025, the University of Graz will host a Private International Law Workshop, following previous editions in Linz (2022), Innsbruck (2023), and Vienna (2024). The workshop, held in German, is being organized by Florian Heindler (SFU Vienna), Simon Laimer (University of Innsbruck), Brigitta Lurger (University of Graz), and Martina Melcher (University […]

Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne / ACER
Énergie
Transport de l’électricité : le Tribunal précise le champ d’application de la coordination régionale obligatoire en matière de sécurité d’exploitation des réseaux de transport d’électricité

Commission de régulation de l’énergie / ACER
Énergie
Transport d’électricité : le Tribunal annule la décision de la commission de recours de l’ACER en ce que cette dernière ne pouvait déroger au cadre juridique applicable dans le cadre de l’adoption de la méthodologie pour la répartition des coûts du « redispatching » et des échanges de contrepartie pour la région CORE

The editors of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law (EYIEL) welcome abstracts from scholars and practitioners at all stages of their career for the EYIEL 2025. This year’s Focus Section will be on Global Sports and International and European Economic Law. Next to this, the General Section will consider contributions addressing Current Challenges, Developments […]

As announced on this blog, the second edition of the European Association of Private International Law Winter School will take place in Como between 10 and 15 February 2025. Organised by the University of Insubria, in cooperation with the Jagiellonian University in Kraków and the University of Murcia, the 2025 edition of the Winter School […]

On 18 September 2024, the UK Supreme Court finally gave the reasons for its unanimous judgment (Lord Leggatt, with whom Lord Reed, Lord Sales, Lord Burrows and Lady Rose agreed), announced on 23 April 2024, in UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC [2024] UKSC 30. It upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal ([2024] […]

Lors de l’exécution d’un mandat d’arrêt européen, si un motif de refus facultatif n’est pas soulevé explicitement par la personne recherchée au sein d’un mémoire, la demande d’information, que peut faire la chambre de l’instruction à l’État membre d’émission avant de prendre sa décision pour vérifier si les conditions liées à sa mise en œuvre sont réunies, n’a pas lieu d’être. Ces exigences dépassent pourtant les prévisions du droit de l’Union. 

en lire plus

As announced, the Mexican Academy of Private International and Comparative Law (AMEDIP) will be holding its annual XLVII Seminar entitled “The teaching, research and promotion of private international law in Mexico” (La enseñanza, investigación y difusión del Derecho Internacional Privado en México) from 23 to 25 October 2024. The final program is now available here. The deadline for early bird registration is 23 September 2024, click here.

In addition, AMEDIP is organising a webinar on Thursday 26 September 2024 at 15:00 (Mexico City time). The topic of the webinar is international civil judicial cooperation & new technologies and will be presented by Prof. Pablo Enrique de Rosas (in Spanish).

The details of the webinar are:

Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88653189527?pwd=3R3n0Wy7W1KjQbs0YaBp0dRJZXaoEd.1

Meeting ID: 886 5318 9527

Password: AMEDIP

Participation is free of charge.

This event will also be streamed live: https://www.facebook.com/AmedipMX

The United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT) is organising a seminar online on the children’s right to be heard (incl. in cases of international child abduction) on 25 September 2024 from 14:00 to 16:00 CEST.

Participation is free of charge. For more information and access details, click here.

The programme is as follows:

14:00  Opening remarks
Marieke Hopman (Maastricht University)

14:05  Institutionalized adolescents and their right to be heard
Julieta Marotta (UNU-MERIT) & Laura Lora (Universidad de Buenos Aires)

14:25  Children in post-conflict peacebuilding and their right to be heard 
Lucy Opoka (Leiden University)

14:45  Internationally abducted children & their right to be heard 
Mayela Celis Aguilar (Maastricht University)

15:05  Family judges and the visibility of children in court
Alicia Taliercio (former Family Judge Prov. Buenos Aires)

15:25  Directors and the right of children to be heard
Natalia V. González García Cuerva (director of Hogar También son Nuestros)

15:45  Open dialogue
Moderator: Julieta Marotta (UNU-MERIT)

UNU-MERIT is a research and training institute of the United Nations University (UNU – headquarters in Tokyo and 13 institutes) which collaborates closely with Maastricht University.

Since its foundation in 1926, the Max Planck Institute in Hamburg (or its predecessor) has continuously published the collection of PIL decisions by German courts. ‘Die deutsche Rechtsprechung auf dem Gebiete des Internationalen Privatrechts’, or short ‘IPRspr’, offers the complete and systematic documentation of German case law on private international law, including procedural law and foreign law. The decisions are boiled down to their private international law aspects and categorized according to subject matter. Depending on the case, the headnotes are reformulated or completely rewritten.

Even though both academics and practitioners have always regarded the IPRspr as an important source of information, its practical value was somewhat diminished by the time lag between the reporting period and the publication, as well as by the limited search options. In order to realize its full potential, it was therefore decided in 2019 to convert the IPRspr into a freely accessible database. After several years of planning, programming and updating, this project has now been successfully concluded under the direction of the Centre for the Application of Foreign Law, headed by Jan Peter Schmidt.

On 1 October 2024 at 11:00, the editorial team will officially present the ‘IPRspr 2.0’, as part of the series ‘Current Research in Private International Law’ (registration at <https://events.mpipriv.de/vorstellungderiprspr>; in line with the language of publication, the event will be in German). The database can already be accessed at <iprspr.de>.

The new IPRspr not only offers free and easy access to the PIL decisions of German courts, but also a wide range of search and retrieval functions. The database currently contains around 6,500 decisions dating back to 2004. New decisions are continually being incorporated. Next to the “Hamburg Guidelines for Ascertaining and Applying Foreign Law in German Litigation”, which will soon be published in their English translation, the IPRspr thus forms another building block for the successful dealing with cross-border cases.

As a book publication, however, the IPRspr will be discontinued. The volume published in 2022 with the decisions from 2019 was therefore the last edition of IPRspr as a printed work after almost a hundred years of existence.

The editorial team encourages the PIL community to cite decisions in parallel with the IPRspr number in future and to submit or communicate new decisions. And it looks forward to any other kind of feedback (iprspr@mpipriv.de).

This post is authored by Antonio Leandro, Professor of Public and Private International Law at the University of Bari. On 19 September 2024, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in case C-501/23 DL v Land Berlin, which deals with the functioning of the COMI in Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings (‘EIR’). The Court […]