Agrégateur de flux

There are in fact many differences between Environment Protection Authority v Grafil Pty Ltd; Environment Protection Authority v MacKenzie [2018] NSWLEC 99 and the CJEU’s Palin Granit; and the regulatory context in NSW is quite different from the EU’s. My title therefore is a crowd pleaser rather than legally sound. Yet some of the issues are similar, hence justifying inclusion in the comparative environmental law /waste law binder (and a good teaser for the W-E).

Samantha Daly and Clare Collett have excellent as well as extensive analysis here and I am happy mainly to refer.

Defendants received materials from recycling depots operated by skip bin companies in Sydney. These materials were recovered fines which had been processed and recycled from building and demolition waste, for which there was no market for re-sale at the time (due to the high volumes of such material produced by the recycling industry). This material was trucked to the Premises by transporters from the recyclers and placed in mounds or stockpiles on the Premises.

Was there a stockpile of ‘waste’? Palin Granit considers similar issues in para 36 in particular.

Geert.

 

Chrysostomides, K. & Co. e.a. / Conseil e.a.
Droit institutionnel
Le Tribunal rejette les demandes d’indemnité de plusieurs particuliers et sociétés concernant la restructuration du secteur bancaire chypriote

Banque postale / BCE
Politique économique
Le Tribunal de l’UE annule les décisions de la BCE refusant à six établissements de crédit français d’exclure du calcul du ratio de levier certaines expositions liées à des livrets d’épargne français

Curto / Parlement
Statut des fonctionnaires
Le Tribunal de l’UE condamne le Parlement européen et la BEI à verser chacun 10 000 euros de dommages-intérêts à des agents victimes de harcèlement moral